Young Supervisors Continue 40-year Tradition
Photo above: James Gore with Cal Fire
When Fourth District Supervisor James Gore takes the reins as Chair of the Board of Supervisors this month, he follows in the footsteps of young Sonoma County leaders who have changed the face and complexion of the region from the coast to the inland valleys.
Gore, a Healdsburger and sixth generation Sonoma County resident, elected at the age of 36 in 2014, was joined on the board this year by Lynda Hopkins, who was 33 at the time of her election.
“The next generation of leadership is on the cusp,” Gore said. “I deal with a lot of people who fought the battles of the 1960s, ’70s and ’80s who bring that in as a prologue of how we can do better.”
But, he worries some people are still “fighting those same fights” from 30 years ago.
“The battles they fought and the scars they developed … I respect the hell out of that.” Gore said. “But at the same time, my question is, ‘is it useful to achieve progress?’”
Both Hopkins and Gore won by healthy margins over longtime local leaders Noreen Evans and Deb Fudge, respectively. They see their mission as maintaining the integrity of what has been fought for and won, while addressing pressing issues—many of which are the same as those that have gone before—in a world that is rapidly changing, both within the boundaries of the county and without. Changes due in part to the accelerated intensity of the technological age.
In the wake of the fires that destroyed entire communities and 5 percent of the housing stock in an already constricted market, their youth and vitality will be sorely needed in a region already facing daunting challenges.
“Since I came into office, we’ve had floods, fire, homelessness and I’m expecting locusts,” Hopkins said. “We had Saturday problems—the ones we woke up with on Oct. 7—and on Monday there was a whole new set of them. And there will be a secondary wave.”
While maintaining agricultural land, greenbelts and open spaces is a top priority for them, Sonoma County’s storied wildlands—and its emergence as a top wine growing region on the planet—might not even exist, had it not been for the youth and idealism that swept the nation in the late-1960s.
Thanks to the General Plan put in place in 1978 after a contentious political battle that saw a change from the “old guard” to members of the budding environmental movement, Sonoma County may very well have looked like San Jose and its environs.
Youth and idealism takes over
The sea change began in the mid-’60s, when a flood of hippies moved to the communes of West County from Haight Ashbury, and disillusioned youths from around the country flocked here in the “back to the land” movement.
Residents of Morning Star and Wheeler ranches began butting heads with longtime landowners and a multi-generational power structure poised to break the county into profitable parcels to sell off to a wave of immigrants from the Bay Area seeking asylum from a population explosion to the south.
But the political tipping point came in 1976, when a 26-year-old Navy veteran from Los Angeles by the name of Eric Koenigshofer was elected to the fifth district by a 368-vote margin.
“My win was a complete surprise to everyone, even me,” he said. “The only time I ever led was the final count.”
Koenigshofer came to Sonoma County to attend Sonoma State University in 1972 after serving a tour in Vietnam. He earned his B.A. in Political Science in 1974, and jumped into the middle of a very contentious and often confusing supervisorial battle that featured recalls and a Fifth District race that at one point had eight candidates.
To top that off, two supervisors, local environmental legend Bill Kortum, who spearheaded the movement to kill a nuclear power plant on Bodega Head, and Chuck Hinkle, were successfully recalled in an election organized by the Sonoma County Taxpayers’ Association.
The recall left a “pro-growth” majority on the board after a third supervisor, Ig Vella resigned to take a position as manager of the Sonoma County Fair, although Vella would have likely faced recall as well.
The board was now comprised of men ready to undo hard-won progress made protecting the coastline and rural aspect of the county. They began what they thought would be a solid hold on power by slashing staffing and protections for the coast. In hindsight, they overplayed their hand.
“It was a regular election cycle, so they didn’t have to do it. They could have waited,” Koenigshofer said. “George DeLong replaced Kortum and immediately cut general plan staff and parks staff, which focused attention on them. They overstepped.”