show menu

Op-Ed Why we MUST vote for Biden

Originally published 9/30, 2020

Do you remember the poster from the 60s :ā€œWar is not healthy for children and other living things?ā€ Now we're faced with an existential threat to all living things and the planet they inhabit.

I neednā€™t tell you about all the disastrous climate events happening around the world right nowā€”just see the news. BUT, itā€™s not too late to stop the progression of the climate crisis. The mediaā€™s finally saying, ā€œOh, this is climate change.ā€ Iā€™m sorry but this isnā€™t climate changeā€”that horse already left the barn. Now we have a Climate Emergency, a Climate Crisis, and a Climate Catastrophe. Meanwhile the President of the United States recently said, ā€œItā€™ll just start getting cooler, you just watch,ā€ and ā€œā€¦ I donā€™t think science knows, actually,ā€ (about climate change).Weā€™ve had over 32 years of science telling us whatā€™s going to happenā€”and itā€™s no longer in the future. Itā€™s HERE, itā€™s NOW.

We must do everything we can to slow this process; the most important thing we can do right now is to VOTE and we have to vote for Biden.

This graph, based on the comparison of atmospheric samples contained in ice cores and more recent direct measurements, provides evidence that atmospheric CO2 has increased since the Industrial Revolution. (Credit: Luthi, D., et al.. 2008; Etheridge, D.M., et al. 2010; Vostok ice core data/J.R. Petit et al.; NOAA Mauna Loa CO2 record.)
This graph, based on the comparison of atmospheric samples contained in ice cores and more recent direct measurements, provides evidence that atmospheric CO2 has increased since the Industrial Revolution. (Credit: Luthi, D., et al.. 2008; Etheridge, D.M., et al. 2010; Vostok ice core data/J.R. Petit et al.; NOAA Mauna Loa CO2 record.)

Climate Change: evidence from Nasa: https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

I keep hearing all the reasons people donā€™t want to do that. They say Biden isnā€™t tough enough on the climate situation (Iā€™m just going to focus on climate issues as thatā€™s my beatā€”but thereā€™re many more reasons to retire the current occupant of the White House, reasons many people also say Biden isnā€™t strong enough on). Yes, Biden isnā€™t as strong as Iā€™d like on many issues, but by comparison, heā€™s terrific.

Antarctic Melting Glacier in a Global Warming Environment. (Shutterstock)
Antarctic Melting Glacier in a Global Warming Environment. (Shutterstock)

Four years ago I wrote an op-ed for this paper about why I, as a Bernie-crat, supported Secretary Clinton. I want to quote from that piece.

ā€œ[In the 2000 election,] I had a dear friend who supported Ralph Nader and the Green Party, telling me, ā€˜we have to stand on principal,ā€™ when I pointed out he was helping elect George W. Bush. He didnā€™t believe me, but in fact Naderā€™s nearly 100,00 votes in Florida wouldā€™ve well offset the 537 votes by which Bush won there.ā€

Had Florida not gone for Bush, weā€™d have been spared eight years of an incredibly bad presidency. (Of course then, I didnā€™t realize how bad it could really get.)

From the perspective of climate change, the US and the world would have been much better off with Al Gore as president, as we would have been with Hilary Clinton as president.

Al Gore as president in 2000, would have been a good thing from the perspective of climate change.
Al Gore as president in 2000, would have been a good thing from the perspective of climate change.

At that time, I wrote, ā€œThere are so many reasons why even four years of [his] presidency would be disastrous, more than I can begin to deal with here. So I will focus just on the one issue that is always my most important oneā€”climate change.

Brush fires have increased in number and intensity due to high tempartures and unusually rapid winds caused by climate change. (Shutterstock)
Brush fires have increased in number and intensity due to high tempartures and unusually rapid winds caused by climate change. (Shutterstock)

ā€œThe current Republican candidate has said climate change is a ā€˜hoax;ā€™ in his own words, heā€™s ā€˜not a big believer in man-made climate change.ā€™ He said, that over billions of years, ā€˜certainly climate has changedā€™ and it goes up, it goes down,ā€¦weā€™ll see what happens.ā€

Unfortunately, we really couldnā€™t afford to wait and ā€œsee what happens;ā€ we see the results all around us.

The difference in the number of extremely hot days expected in July in todayā€™s world and a world without climate change across Japan. Yellow indicates little to no difference in the number of hot days in todayā€™s world and a world without climate change, while red indicates a difference of up to eight days. (The map also includes parts of eastern China, Russia and North and South Korea.) Source: Imada et al. (2019)
The difference in the number of extremely hot days expected in July in todayā€™s world and a world without climate change across Japan. Yellow indicates little to no difference in the number of hot days in todayā€™s world and a world without climate change, while red indicates a difference of up to eight days. (The map also includes parts of eastern China, Russia and North and South Korea.) Source: Imada et al. (2019)

In 2018 in Japan, more than 1,000 people died during an unprecedented heat wave. In 2019, scientists proved it would have been impossible without global warming.

The map shows that global warming has caused ā€œa pronounced increase in extremely hot days in the populated areas of Japanā€, including Tokyo, the authors say in their research paper. [ https://www.carbonbrief.org/japans-deadly-2018-heatwave-could-not-have-happened-without-climate-change ]

The current president:

  • fulfilled his promise to slash funding for the Environmental Protection Agency,
  • rolled back over 70 environmental programs,
  • opened up national monuments and wildlife refuges for more drilling.
  • appointed judges to uphold his executive orders and
  • took us out of the Paris Climate Agreement.

I hear many people echoing my friend from 2000, saying they feel itā€™s more principled to not vote for Biden; theyā€™ll write in Bernie Sandersā€”who has totally supported Bidenā€™s nomination; theyā€™ll vote Green Party; theyā€™ll write in anyone else; or theyā€™ll just not vote. Make no mistakeā€”ANY action we take OTHER than voting for Biden is a vote for his opponent and a vote for ongoing Climate Disaster.

We arenā€™t just voting for Biden, weā€™re voting for so many other really important thingsā€”including the next Supreme Court Justices, and all the climate legislation that weā€™ll need if weā€™re to survive this Climate Catastrophe. Here in California, Biden is very likely to win, but itā€™s still important what WE do here.

Reach out to your family and friends in other states to do the same and get involved with helping to get out the vote for the planet in other states, (See suggestions in my op-ed piece in the July Gazette:

The-most-important-election-of-my-lifetime >>

ANY action we take OTHER than voting for Biden is a vote for his opponent and a vote for ongoing Climate Disaster.

Addendum: Joe Biden on Climate Change:

It's almost like denying gravity now. ... The willing suspension of disbelief can only be sustained for so long.

ā€”Joe Biden on climate denial, March 2015

INSIDE CLIMATE CHANGE: Joe Biden on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands

Excerpted from Inside Climate News:

"Iā€™m one of the first guys to introduce a climate change bill, way, way back in ā€˜87," Biden said during a stump speech in Des Moines, Iowa, on May 1.ā€œ

ā€œA review of the legislative history shows Biden is right:

The Delaware senatorā€™s first climate change bill, introduced in 1986, died in the Senate. But the following year a version of Bidenā€™s legislation survived as an amendment to a State Department funding bill. In 1987 The President went on to sign it into law.ā€ [ fact check ]

"Global Climate Protection Act of 1987 - Directs the President to establish a Task Force on the Global Climate to research, develop, and implement a coordinated national strategy on global climate. Requires such Task Force to transmit a United States Strategy on the Global Climate to the President within a year. Requires the President to then report to specified Members of Congress on such report.

Biden was in the Senate 36 years, and he had a lifetime environmental voting score of 83 percent from the League of Conservation Voters. In 2007, he supported higher fuel efficiency standards for motor vehicles, which passed, and in 2003, modest caps on greenhouse gas emissions.

The Biden-Obama administration was strong on climate change, especially in its second term, notably achieving the landmark Paris climate agreement, asserting climate action and jobs go hand in hand. It pushed through auto fuel economy standards that deeply cut emissions. It also produced regulations on coal-fired power plants, though the rule was stymied by litigation and has been replaced with a weaker rule by the Trump administration.

Getting Specific

Inside Climate News
Inside Climate News

Biden surprised some activists and pundits in June when he presented his campaign's first climate platform. It went further than many of his previous positions, and embraced the Green New Deal as a "crucial framework."

Biden foresees $1.7 trillion in spending over the next 10 years, and $3.3 trillion in investments by the private sector and state and local governments for renewable energy.

He wants Congress to pass emissions limits with "an enforcement mechanism ... based on the principles that polluters must bear the full cost of the carbon pollution they are emitting." He said it would include "clear, legally-binding emissions reductions," but did not give details.

In July, Biden released a policy agenda that aims to boost the rural economy, in part by expanding a program that will pay farmers to use farming techniques that store carbon in the soil.

His plan also calls for support for economically impacted communities. He was slow to agree with activists' calls for him to swear off campaign contributions from fossil fuel interests, but did sign the No Fossil Fuel Funding pledge on June 27.ā€œ

READ MORE here: https://insideclimatenews.org/news/24062019/joe-biden-climate-change-global-warming-election-2020-candidate-profile

We've moved our commenting system to Disqus, a widely used community engagement tool that you may already be using on other websites. If you're a registered Disqus user, your account will work on the Gazette as well. If you'd like to sign up to comment, visit https://disqus.com/profile/signup/.
Show Comment