Advertise
Free Compliments of our Advertisers
Sonoma County Gazette
Deadlines
Subscribe
Menu
Why One Justice on the Supreme Court Matters
It’s likely that the future of DACA, our state’s sanctuary laws and many of the Administration's efforts to limit legal immigration will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Why One Justice on the Supreme Court Matters

Oct 3, 2018
by Christopher Kerosky, Kerosky, Purves & Bogue, LLP, Sonoma County Human Rights Commissioner

Share:

One judge can make a huge difference in many lives—including the lives of immigrants. 

In 2015, one federal judge in Texas unilaterally blocked an Executive Order issued by President Obama called DAPA that would have extended a reprieve from deportation and a work permit to 5 million people.  Later that same year, the difference on the federal appeals court was one judge in a 2-1 ruling affirming the decision of that Texas judge. 

And one justice on the Supreme Court would have tipped the balance in June 2016, when the vote on that Court tied 4-4 on whether the law was constitutional, leaving the Texas judge’s unprecedented ruling in place.  Justice Scalia had died in February and the Republicans had blocked Obama’s nominee to replace him — Merrick Garland — who would have likely voted in favor of the law. 

That DAPA law was modeled after DACA but applied to all undocumented immigrants with a clean record and U.S. citizen children.  Immigration advocates heralded it as a temporary solution for a huge segment of our local North Bay undocumented population, who are vital to our economy.  Probably more than 25,000 immigrant families in Sonoma County alone would have benefited from DAPA. 

Instead, while the case was still on review, Donald Trump won the election and promptly killed the law.  As a result, 5 million immigrants are still in limbo, living in the shadows, in fear of deportation.

Now DACA and our sanctuary laws are at stake.

Currently, the state of Texas is leading an effort to repeal DACA as unconstitutional. They have filed again in the same federal court in Brownsville, Texas where there is only one judge — the same one who struck down DAPA.  The judge has expressed the possibility that he may invalidate DACA, thereby closing down that law nationwide.  Since other Courts have found DACA constitutional, this issue will likely be resolved by the Supreme Court; if it votes to terminate the law, that would deprive 800,000 young people of their temporary legal status and expose them to deportation.

Another key subject before the courts is California’s sanctuary law.  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected Trump’s challenges to those laws; that case will probably be decided by the Supreme Court.  If our sanctuary laws are struck down, we could return to the days when our undocumented immigrants were turned over to ICE for deportation after traffic violations and other misdemeanors.

Another legal issue headed for the courts: the U.S. Department of Homeland Security just announced measures to punish immigrants otherwise eligible for a green card if anyone in their immediate family ever received certain government assistance. Despite Trump’s statements to the contrary, our laws have always prohibited undocumented immigrants from getting food stamps, social security or Medicaid.  But the U.S. citizen children of such immigrants are eligible.

This comes up when a person marries a U.S. citizen and navigates the lengthy process to obtain permanent residence.   Immigrants applying for residence have always had to show that they were not dependent on the government or likely to become so.   They have to present a sworn affidavit from relatives promising to support them economically with documentation showing their financial ability to do so. 

Under this new Trump law, the immigrant can be denied a green card if at some point during their lives in the U.S. their U.S. citizen children or spouse legallyreceived government assistance.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has also issued a series of administrative orders intended to limit the opportunities for immigrants to obtain legal status.  These have ranged from redefining asylum to exclude many victims of domestic violence to limiting a Court’s discretion to close deportation cases when an immigrant is married to a U.S. citizen or otherwise entitled to permanent residence. 

Sessions also appears to be considering a change in a law that requires the government to release from custody asylum applicants — including families — who have proven to an asylum officer that they have a credible fear of persecution in their home country.  His order permitting these asylum applicants to be held indefinitely is expected later this fall.

Many of these Trump initiatives are being challenged in court and will likely end up on the Supreme Court’s docket. 

This nominee will be the deciding vote

So, if you think the current debate over the Supreme Court nominee doesn’t concern immigrants, think again.

It’s likely that the future of DACA, our state’s sanctuary laws and many of these Trump Administration efforts to limit legal immigration will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. If that happens, the vote of one justice will probably make the difference.  Since the court is evenly split 4-4 on many critical issues, the new justice will likely be the deciding vote.  That Justice could be Trump’s nominee, Brett Kavanaugh who has a record of ruling against immigrants

Immigrant Stories

Comments:

Oct 18, 2018
SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL: Again I have to take issue with the October article by Christopher Kerosky. I grant his self-interest, being an immigration attorney. Until the resignation of Justice Kennedy during the Supreme Court's recess period, some decisions ended up 5 to 4 - he was considered the swing vote, going either way; that is what a judge is supposed to do, decide each case on its merits. The replacement because of Justice Scalia's death, filled by President Trump with a constitutionist caused some resistance, but since the Democrats felt confident they would win in the November election, there was limited protest and even some Democratic senators voted for his confirmation. But the Kavanaugh nomination, even though his record on the DC court proves his independent stance - he served also as a law clerk for Kennedy - the rage erupted - the circus began and the mob culture directed by Democratic senators, whose deportment should be deplored by everyone, was in full sway. A mans' reputation was besmirched and his family humiliated - their lives will never be the same, nor will ours. From now on, you are guilty until proven innocent. If the mob decides in advance, so be it. As for the immigration question - the laws definitely need to be changed and unless we stop allowing more and more unskilled immigrants in, the more inequality we will have in our society. The news lately is that the labor market has millions of jobs in need of skilled workers, not those trying to get in. I feel badly for those who live in countries where life is harsh and their leaders brutal, but I also feel all of this animosity and lack of civil discourse between us will eventually make us as uninviting as the countries from which these people are fleeing. Barbara Cuneo Windsor
- Vesta Copestakes

Login to Make a Comment

Please support our sponsors:

Bike Partner.net Logo

Call 855-483-3732 to find out about Folding, Cargo & Electric Bikes. Perfect for a SMART Train Ride!

Fine Tree Care - Sonoma County Tree Services
Locally-Owned Jewelry Businesses in Sonoma County

Find Goldsmiths and Jewelers who create custom designs, offer jewelry repair, estate appraisals, and gems.

Flower Shops and Florists of Sonoma County

Please support locally-owned businesses and tell them the Gazette sent you - THANK YOU!

Sonoma County Bicycle Shops and Groups

Sonoma County Bike Shops and Groups. Find LOCALLY-OWNED Bicycle Shops for NEW, Used and Rental Bicycles as well as REPAIR. Look for a bike-riding group that suits your needs and style.


Please use the Gazette's Guide to find LOCALLY-OWNED Garden Businesses to support Sonoma County's environmental and economic health and vitality.

Sonoma County Ice Cream and Frozen Dessert Shops LOCAL Guide 2018

Sonoma County Ice Cream and Frozen Dessert LOCAL Shops Guide 2018