Sebastopol Saves! Energy Audits for Residents

Sebastopol Saves!

City’s Energy Committee and local realtors group walking for clean energy

The City of Sebastopol Energy Committee, along with members of the Sebastopol Chapter of the North Bay Association of REALTORS® (NorBAR) and other local organizations, want to help Sebastopol residents save money by making their homes water and energy efficient. Sebastopol REALTORS® will be going door-to-door in March to give residents and businesses the information they need to do just that!

Businesses and residents might be paying much more than they need to if their home or place of business is not energy efficient. Inadequate insulation, cracks and leaks, single pane windows, low efficiency showerheads and toilets result in high utility bills and don't help the environment.

Walkers will be providing information to encourage residents to spend a little to save a lot by performing an energy audit on their buildings. The audits will itemize the improvements needed to reduce water and energy bills by making buildings water and energy efficient. This will enable residents to do their part to help the environment by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and reducing our dependence on diminishing fossil fuel supplies.

“We have installed a new green furnace and double pane windows which made our house much warmer, reduced our heating bill and gave us rebates from PGE and a federal tax credit,” said Councilmember Kathleen Shaffer.

The Sonoma County Energy Independence Program (SCEIP) will offer help with financing the improvements. SCEIP may also finance the energy audit to help determine what is needed. All of the information necessary will be in a reusable bag delivered to every address in Sebastopol. Coupons for FREE low flow showerheads and toilet replacements will also be in the bag.

“This is a wonderful contribution to our community by NorBAR and our other partners. Once again, Sebastopol is at the forefront of smart energy action,” said Councilman Larry Robinson, co-chair of the City’s Energy Committee.

Other partners in this community effort include PG&E and Solar Sonoma County. Sebastopol residents and businesses should expect a knock at their door during the second or third weekend of March. Packets of information and coupons will be left at each home and business.

Read article »

Supervisors Vote on Dutra March 16

Public Hearing on Dutra Plant
Supervisors to Vote
Tuesday,March 16, 2010, 1:30 pm
Sonoma County Board of Supervisors
575 Administration Drive, Room 100 A
Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Does Sonoma County need Dutra’s proposed asphalt plant on the Petaluma River opposite Shollenberger Park? Dutra says it does, that there are no significant health or environmental risks, and that their newly modified proposals for barge mooring and offloading nullifies concerns about navigability and dredging of the channel. According to Dutra, its production of tonnage is necessary for federal funding for dredging, keeping the river navigable.

These contentions are disputed by numerous local citizens, public bodies and environmental groups, contending that Dutra’s statements are not trustworthy and that potential harms to human health, wildlife, the air, roads and river are huge. The Petaluma City Council has urged a “no” vote by the Supervisors, citing these concerns as well as visibility from the freeway at the southern gateway to the city and county.

Shollenberger Park is part of a historic wetland area, painstakingly restored to support wetland species of birds, plants, mammals, fish, and invertebrates, and at the same time to filter impaired water going to San Francisco Bay. At the same time, it provides an area for dredged river sediments. Last month, National Geographic's Sustainable Tourism Website announced that Petaluma Wetlands has been selected as a geo-tourism destination.

The issues are too complex to be explored in this space, but the public is encouraged to attend this most important meeting, which has been postponed numerous times due to shifting information. Extensive information as well as argument from both points of view are available on these websites:
Dutra’s website: www.petalumaasphaltplant.com/
“Save Shollenberger Park” coalition: www.saveshollenberger.com/

Read article »

Santa Rosa's Roseland Community Park gets Funded

District Awards Matching Funds for City of Santa Rosa Park
Board approves $2.42 million for Roseland Creek Community Park and Trail Project

Today (February 23, 2010), the Board approved a $2.42 million grant to the City of Santa Rosa for the acquisition of 7 acres located at 1370 and 1400 Burbank Avenue for an eventual park and trail project located in southwest Santa Rosa. The Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District recommended the project for funding in 2008 as part of its Matching Grant Program.

“This park is a needed asset for the community and will directly benefit the children in the Roseland School District,” said Efren Carrillo, Fifth District Supervisor. “Through the Matching Grant Program we are able to bolster local programs to make more parks and recreational opportunities available, as well as create quality environmental, educational and economic resources for the neighborhoods of our cities.”

This acquisition represents a portion of the larger 18 acres identified for park and trail development located between Burbank and McMinn Avenues, and is the first of a multi-phased project. The City is currently negotiating additional acquisitions totaling approximately 11 acres located at 1027 McMinn and 1360 Burbank Avenues and has applied for funding from the District as part of its 2009 grant program.

The site was identified as a potential park in the City’s general plan and comprises a reach of Roseland Creek, grasslands, and oak savanna. The proposed park is within a one-mile radius of four elementary schools, two middle schools, and two high schools of the Roseland School District, and is expected to support a variety of community activities, including environmental education and after-school programs.

“The acquisition of this property will bring us closer to realizing our general plan goal of increasing parkland and recreational amenities for our residents,” said Marc Richardson, Assistant City Manager and Director of Recreation, Parks and Community Services. “By partnering with the District, the City of Santa Rosa is able to leverage its resources to create an 18-acre park envisioned by the community.”

As its matching contribution, the City will provide nearly $2.8 million of city funding, grants, and professional in-kind services toward ongoing park maintenance, restoration and enhancement of the creek. The Matching Grant Program guidelines require a 1:1 contribution match from applicants, which can include direct contributions and in-kind services and materials, with no more than 50 percent of the match identified for operations and maintenance.

Both Measures C and F, approved by the voters in 1990 and 2006, respectively, provide for the Matching Grant Program. Since 1994, the District has administered and based funding for this program on available sales tax revenues. To date, nearly $28 million in matching grants have been selected for funding of land acquisition, development of recreational amenities, and restoration of open space within or near urban areas. Projects include the Town Green in Windsor, the Prince Memorial Greenway in Santa Rosa, and the 250-acre expansion of land along the Petaluma River for public access and habitat enhancement adjacent to Schollenberger Park. As the District anticipates an approximate 10 percent decline in its revenue for FY09-10, the program is budgeted at $2 million or nearly 13% of its total revenues for the year.

“Now, more than ever, this program is especially important as it leverages the resources of our city, local agency, and non-profit partners to develop parks and restore open space for our urban communities,” said District General Manager Bill Keene. “Our success relies on the ability to offer a program that responds to the changing needs of our applicants.”

About the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District
The Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District permanently protects the diverse agricultural, natural resource and scenic open space lands of Sonoma County for future generations. Since 1990, the District has protected more than 83,000 acres. Agricultural and open space lands have been protected through a 1/4-cent sales tax approved by voters in 1990 and reauthorized in 2006. For more information, please visit www.sonomaopenspace.org

Read article »

Target Center and Petaluma in Conflict

The Petaluma “Target Center” Brouhaha

By Connie Madden
A lawsuit has been filed against Petaluma by Regency Centers claiming undue delays in approval for its East Washington Place project and Petaluma’s city manager, John Brown stated staff needs additional time to study implications of the lawsuit and recommended no vote be taken at the next meeting Monday, January 25th while staff completes its review. January 4, 2010 marked the first time Petaluma City Council was able to hear the project “in full” and Council called for further review by the PC and staff. To view the lawsuit, go to http://frankpetaluma.wordpress.com/new-regency-target-lawsuit/

The process was a necessary one, beginning with Petaluma completing its General Plan that serves as “a policy document that embodies the community’s goals and guides decisions about physical development over the long term”.

While GP 2025, 7 years in the making, marks a preference for living wage jobs so people who work here can live here (saving Petaluma medical fees for low-paid workers), a preference for pedestrian and bicycle-friendly projects and density, it also stipulates that large new projects provide a “net positive” to the economy and the community. (See Chapters 9 and 11 of the GP)
During the wait for approval, the project was reviewed by the Planning Commission and time-consuming EIR, CEQA and FEIA reports were created.

However, as a member of the Petaluma Community Coalition, which brought stakeholders in this project together for many hours of discussion, I recall scant reference to these GP preferences. Although Regency prepared a FEIA (fiscal and economic impact assessment) as requested, their FEIA showed only projected profits. There was not enough economic information to show the true costs of this project. Council members could not know what existing businesses would likely be closed due to this project (which current taxes to the city would be lost) or which suppliers to those businesses would be impacted.

Mayor Pamela Torliatt, as quoted in the Press Democrat said regarding the lawsuit “They’re being their own worst enemy if they want to get to a decision” and added the city is responding carefully to the lawsuit. Planning Commission members expressed a similar sentiment late in December when it was noted the project was basically a 1970’s shopping mall design rather than the desired mixed use, would cause heavy traffic congestion and pollution, and there is no guarantee the project would be a success a few years down the line.

Regency “one of the largest operators of grocery-anchored shopping centers. About 90 percent of its shopping centers are anchored by grocers ranking in the top three of their market,” (Wikepedia) could also presumably replace named tenants with others upon approval of the project and many Regency centers include WalMart, which, conceivably, they could invite to East Washington Place if Petaluma Target leaves. Target has stated it is “unduly punitive” for them to be asked to pay a vacancy tax should they decide to move, an agreement built into their Davis project.

It is to be noted that East Washington Place was first presented before a council which did not have a “progressive” majority and a planning commission that generally wanted the project – yet that Council did not approve the project.

Petaluma is a leader in smart growth practices and was acknowledged by Green Belt Alliance in 2007 when they voted Petaluma the top rating in the Bay Area for “Preventing sprawl; Making sure parks are nearby; Creating homes people can afford; encouraging a mix of uses; Encouraging density in the right places; Requiring less land for parking; and Defining standards for good development.”

The decision to approve a project or not to is the prerogative of Petaluma Council - the town has no obligation to hurry its process or change policy to appease Target Corporation. East Washington Place is the interface between the East and West sides of town - and residents and future residents will benefit by the best possible project for now and the 50 or so years the project will be in place.

Petaluma’s General Plan stipulates large new developments shall provide a net positive for the city. But we don't know if this project can do that. December 2009 retail data for the nation shows an unprecedented loss of over 6% from last year. That means a lot of retail stores - including chains - are closing their doors while unemployment rises across the state.

Read article »

Spirit of Santa Rosa by Nina Tepedino

I am very pleased to be the new Santa Rosa columnist for the Sonoma County Gazette. I now reside in downtown Santa Rosa, after being a resident of Sebastopol in the seventies and then again from 2003 to 2008.

Even in the seventies, Santa Rosa was not just a place we drove through on our way to soak in Calistoga. There were the Harmony Festivals, concerts with the Sonoma County Chorus as a soprano soloist, parks to walk in, good restaurants and the big new 3rd St. Cinema (which has just announced its foreclosure and struggles to survive.)

Recently, in the last few years there have been the Farmer’s Markets, the Rialto, more festivals, the Fair, gatherings and marches for Peace and Justice, the county office of education, substituting in a variety of schools throughout the Valley and the GE Free campaign, with many of us together in solidarity against the threat posed by Monsanto and the necessity to protect our local organic farms and food sources.

For the past year, I have lived in a high rise apartment building in downtown Santa Rosa, where, from my balcony, I see Mt. St. Helena, Geyser Peak, the valley, the art deco Roxy sign, the sunsets and the saved trees. I have begun to appreciate this part of our county. I am beginning to feel connected to the spirit of this small city and its surrounding neighborhoods, as I walk around, talk with people, shop on Fourth St., even enjoy the Mall, walk to the library, run into Sawyers for the newspapers (which I am very sad to report, is going out of business in May!) and practice my Tai Chi in the Burbank Gardens. So, I will be reporting with a slant for the artistic, nature, the issues that contribute to improving the life of our planet and caring for each other.

An Historical Tidbit
According to popular legend, this area was named by Father Amorosa, after baptizing a young Native American woman in a stream. Because the baptism took place on the Feast of Santa Rosa, it was the name given to the stream and later to the whole small city/town and to the young woman who was baptized. In the seventies, someone told me the name given to the whole valley by the local Pomo, Miwok or Wappo nations, which I don’t remember. It was translated to mean the Valley of Tears, where there were swamps and heavy mists. Does anyone out there know more about this early legend?

The Environment...
Our Green Spaces
This mid January seems to be the time for pruning the roses and all the flowering shrubs. During these darkest of days, it is time to prepare for Spring. Perhaps a time to do some needed pruning in our lives....a time to plant seeds......a time to find a community garden.....a time to create your own backyard plot.

In the coming months, you will be learning more about the iGROW campaign being launched by the Sonoma County Dept of Health Services in their downtown Santa Rosa offices. The iGROW campaign will be supporting home, school and community gardens. Juilliard Park area and the Burbank Historic District sponsor a community garden. I am going to have my plot there to grow much of my own food. But, more on gardens in the up-coming March issue.

Also, try to reaquaint yourself with this park and the gardens. Wonderful places to visit! Bring your camera, because if you are a lover of ancient trees and garden design, you will discover extraordinary arts of nature to photograph!

The Arts
It will be interesting to follow how the AT&T building and addition controversy will be resolved. The proposal to move the Sonoma County Museum to this more central courthouse square location would be a welcomed development.

If you have never visited the Museum, don’t wait for years to go by, like I did, before discovering its vitality and importance in the artistic life of Santa Rosa. My first deep encounter was at the Ansel Adams event last June. The museum next presents “Richard Shaw: Four Decades of Ceramics” Jan 30-May 20, 425 Seventh St. SR.

Did you know that you can attend the 2PM Saturday afternoon rehearsals of the Santa Rosa Symphony’s weekend of concerts at the Wells Fargo Center for only $10?
I plan to attend one this coming Sat-Jan 24, that features Joann Falletta, conductor in an all-American composer program. I hope some of you will able to go and listen, too.

On our next sunshine day (and yes, we will be in the light, again!) take a stroll along the Santa Rosa Creek walk/bike trail between Santa Rosa Ave. and Railroad Square, and experience the breathtaking mural art projects that now cover the concrete embankments. They are beautiful and joyous to see!

In Memoriam: Anne Marie Joergenson, 1938-2010
She was a very respected art therapist, who worked with abused/at risk children and was active for many years with Becoming Independent, a non-profit agency that assists people with disabilities. I regret that I never had a chance to meet her.

Years ago, in New York State, as a public school music teacher, we were searching for a distinctive title for a multi cultural concert my fifth and sixth graders were producing. I discovered a wonderful Haitian word: BAMBOUCHE, meaning a festive get together. I cannot sign off without saying how deeply I hope for the Haitians’ strength and the true success of the rescue mission so that they may once again have Bambouche in their families and in their lives

I know the Santa Rosa spirit will infect you and I look forward to hearing from our readers.

Read article »

North Coast News

This is my first column for the North Coast Communities. I hope to cover every town from Duncans Mills north to Steward Point, and Sea Ranch. Although many of the towns are small with only a few residents, they make up the fabric that is Sonoma County, and offer some of the best of what makes us great. I will need your help to keep me informed of what is going on in your community. As I am coming into this late, and the deadline is looming. I will be concentrating on the town of Duncans Mills this month

Town Meeting
I would like to start out by giving an update on a Duncans Mills town meeting that took place November 2nd at the Blue Heron. Sponsored by the Duncans Mills Merchant Association, with Supervisor Efren Callillo, and Tom O’Kane, road Manager for Caltrans. State Assembly member Maddy Hirshfied was scheduled to be in attendance, but had to cancel at the last minute due to illness. The meeting was regarding the speed limit and road crossing through town. There were about 50 of the towns 85 residents in attendance expressing their concern with the safety of crossing the street in town with cars traveling at 50+ miles an hour. There were many stories of close calls, and near misses for residents and tourist alike trying to get from one side to the other.

What other town can you travel at 50 miles an hour through the center of town? According to Bobbie Jeanne Quercia, chairperson for the event, what they hope to get is a lower speed limit, and a stop sign at the intersection of 116 and Moscow Rd. Bobbie has received an update from Tom O’Kane’s office that Caltrans would be painting an island in the crossing to make it safer to cross the intersection. Hopefully that is just an intern step. I will keep you posted on any updates.

Town Slogan
Also new in Duncans Mills is their new slogan. The town sponsored a contest with KZST to come up with a slogan for their town. They received almost 300 entries. The top 5 entries as selected by the merchants were then voted on by the listeners, and Amy Catelli’s “Arrive as a Stranger, Leave as a Friend” was chosen.

At the towns Christmas tree lighting on December 12th, she was awarded a $1000.00 shopping spree in the town’s shops, Dinner at The Blue Heron Restaurant, Breakfast the next day at Cafe Fear Restaurant, and a nights stay at Carol and Ferds Sabino’s Vacation rental Wicker House in nearby Cazadero. Brent Farris from KZST was on hand to award the check. Even thought the weather did not corporate, a festive time was had by everyone. Congratulations Amy. There are a number of wonderful shops in town, so be sure to stop by and become a friend. I know the merchants would love to see you. I hear there are other changes coming to town. I will let you know what they are when I have more information.

The Blue Heron will be having a Speed Dating Event on February 13th. It should be a lot of fun. Stop in or call for more information

North Coast Info Please...
As I have said this column is for all of the communities of the north coast, so if you have any information, or anything that you would like to share about your community, please feel free to email me at mrtromblystea@yahoo.com, or call and leave a message at 707-865-9979.
I want this column to be about all the current activities in our North Coast towns - Jenner, Bodega, Bodega Bay - wherever the gazette is distributed along the Coast - -so please share the information that makes your community great.

I hope everyone's New Years is starting out on the right foot and every one is keeping to their resolutions. I know how hard that can be. One pound down, 19 to go!! Valentine’s day is just around the corner, don’t forget to let that special someone in your life know just how much they mean to you. Be safe and well!

Read article »

What's Up in Windsor by Deb Fudge

Windsor is very excited to be included in a regular column in the Sonoma County Gazette! We are a family friend town that opens our doors to all of Sonoma County, and so we welcome this opportunity to tell you more about the community we’ve built in Windsor.

We hope that many of you have visited our Town Green on the west side of Windsor. What you may not know is that the Downtown and Town Green were planned by Windsor citizens. This was an effort that took place in the mid 1990’s. We had a vision of what we wanted to become, and we created it in five short years. We were a newly incorporated town (1992) that was really just a town full of subdivision housing and one grocery store. We wanted to create a place where the town could gather together, to celebrate who we are, and to get to know one another.

Our vision became a reality in 2000, when the Town Green was completed and opened to the public. That summer we held our first concert series on the Green. The following year, the mixed use buildings started to rise from the vacant lots in our old Downtown. Windsor is very proud of who we have become, and we welcome one and all to visit and enjoy what we have built. A committee of residents is now lining up bands for our summer concert series – stay tuned for details!

New Community Garden
The Town removed a small piece of lawn last year between two town owned buildings, and with help from the community, created a demonstration garden with raised bed plots. There was so much excitement generated, that Windsor residents, led by landscape designer Thomas Eddy, have now created a very large new community garden adjacent to Town Hall. There is space for over 60 plots, and signups are being taken now! The Town Council contributed $15,000 to offset initial costs, and now we have handed the project over to the community. During February, construction of the plots and irrigation system will occur. In March, you can begin to plant! Go to http://www.telcs.com/cgarden/Windsor_Community_Garden/Welcome.html
for more information. This a great way to provide wholesome, healthy, locally grown food for your family. Some of what is grown will be donated to those in need in the Windsor area.

Other Events
The Windsor Chamber’s Annual Chamber Business Expo is February 9, 4:30 to 7:30 p.m. at the Mary Agatha Furth Center on Old Redwood Highway. This is a great place to get to talk to most Windsor business owners in person.

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Central Sonoma County will hold a crab feed, dance and auction at the gym at the Windsor clubhouse on February 6, 2010. Email Shannon Howard, at showard@bgccsc.org to reserve your tickets or to donate an auction item.

Tuesday Night Dinner Club
Who says all the good restaurants are in Healdsburg? We have our fair share of really good eateries that we are really proud of. I remember a planning commission meeting in 1995 where a resident came and pleaded: “All we want is one sit down restaurant”. What a sad statement that was! Well now we have over 30 such restaurants. We found that out when we started the Tuesday Night Dinner Club, where a loosely organized group of Windsorites visit local restaurants on Tuesday nights as a group. We formed the club in the dead of winter a year ago, to help our eateries through the recession. We just celebrated week #56! And Sebastopol has carried our idea to their fair city. Anyone who wants to join us can email me, or visit the What’s Up in Windsor page on Facebook to find out where we are eating next.

Read article »

Cloverdale Comments by Carol Russell

Still In Love With Our “Home Town!”

I am so proud to have witnessed how, by retaining our optimistic, unified, “small town” spirit Cloverdalians have met, and will continue to met, the greatest challenge presented by the worst economy in 80 years.

However tough the times get, whether we’re natives or newcomers, we are overwhelmingly still in love with our “home town!”

You see, there’s a very special blend of past and present here that helps smooth the way into the future no matter what. I call it “Organic Continuity” and it provides our community with stability, resiliency and far-sightedness springing from our self-reliant yet collaborative agrarian, entrepreneurial, and artistic roots mixed together with inherent multi-culturalism and a variety of intergenerational traditions which are, in turn, reinforced by our many volunteer-driven community occasions and legendary annual events.

To give you a sense of what I’m talking about, I’d like to tell you about a few of the latter.
For instance, as I write this, the 35th “Annual Old Time Fiddle Contest And Festival” has just wound down at the Fairgrounds in the heart of town on Citrus Fair Drive. Typically, about 1,500 attendees enjoy two days of expert playing in a variety of age groups and genres along with some very cool impromptu jamming, strolling entertainers, and plenty of good food. For a sample of the 2010 event catch the new Tim Elson video on YouTube. (If this music doesn’t cheer you, better check your pulse.)

Did you know that, for a week in early January, our Fairgrounds also host a world-famous wine tasting founded in 1983 as the “Cloverdale Citrus Fair Wine Competition” and known internationally for the last decade, in its expanded regional framework, as the “San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition?” This year, 63 wine fabled experts “tested and evaluated a world-record breaking 4,913 entries, a number that maintains the competition’s status as the largest competition of American wines in the world.” For a great history of this remarkable event see www.winejudging.com.

Now it’s early February so everyone here is either helping getting ready for, or happily anticipating, the 118th Annual “Cloverdale Citrus Fair”, also held at the Fairgrounds, from the 12th through the 15th.

Established in 1892, the Citrus Fair is one of the state’s oldest municipal fairs. Because it takes place each and every President’s Day weekend, Cloverdale always has the honor of being the first fair of the calendar year.

The 2010 theme is a “Salute To the U.S. Military” and we’ll find that focus reflected throughout the many exhibits and fair entries. In addition, we’ll enjoy an old-fashioned, American county fair experience with the “Citrus Fair Queen Pageant” and memorial scholarship award (teen entrants must have a GPA of 3.5 or better!), family entertainment that includes a clown and comedy/musical acts plus favorite carnival rides, games, and that only-at-the-fair food we can never resist along with showcases in both the Tea Room and the Arts and Crafts Building plus fair entries like baked goods, photography and artwork. In short, lots more than I can list here. (Be sure to enter the Raffle! A couple of years ago I won a fabulous quilt by Cloverdale artist Marge Gray. )

Also among “must sees” are those elaborate, three-dimensional exhibits in the main hall. Unique to our Fair, they are created by imaginative competitors using primarily citrus. Consistently imaginative, often lovely, sometimes humorous, they are frequently amazing. And do join us for the “USO-style” Cabaret dinner show at just $40 a ticket!

Fair days/hours: Friday, noon to 10p.m.; Saturday/Sunday, 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.; Monday, 10 a.m. to 5p.m. Ticket prices: free to the “under 5 crowd”; $4 Juniors (6-12); $4 Seniors (62+); $6 General (ages 13 up); $15 General Season Passes; $8 Sr/Jr. Season Passes. Info: www.cloverdalectrusfair.org

Reading this too late to get to the Citrus Fair? Then plan a visit next year. Meanwhile, watch this column and www.cloverdale.net to see the Events Calendar and discover even more reasons for you to be in love with our home town, too!

Read article »

Healdsburg Happenings with Mike McGuire

I look forward to contributing news about Northern Sonoma County, and as a new columnist for the Gazette, just want to introduce myself.

I am glad to be contributing because I feel really connected to Sonoma County, including its agriculture, its environment and its resources. My family goes back four generations as prune farmers here. I grew up in the Alexander Valley and Healdsburg, raised by my mom and grandma. I have been glad to be able to “give back” to Sonoma County by serving on the School Board and Healdsburg City Council. I am now proud to be involved in a printing company in our community.

There is so much happening up here!

I am proud how folks came out for Martin Luther King day - we collected groceries for the food bank in Windsor, and over 300 coats for the homeless in Healdsburg.

Just spent this weekend at the Old Time Fiddle Festival in Cloverdale with my fiancé Erika. Amazing how much talent our music festivals attract to our county – as well as so much local talent too. We are so lucky to have the Jazz Festival and Guitar Festival, art walks, and great classical music too!

Coming up February 5 to the 7th will be the Wild Steelhead Festival on the Healdsburg Plaza. This is an amazing event every year, sponsored by Trout Unlimited, the Russian Riverkeeper, Hotel Healdsburg, and the Chamber of Commerce. There will be a free trout pond, fly fishing demonstration, exhibits and cooking demos – as well as great food, music and wine-tasting. More info at: healdsburgsteelheadfest.org

The Russian Riverkeeper has been instrumental, working with the Clean Water Coalition of Northern Sonoma County , to make sure that the river continues as a pristine community resource. Our lives interact with the river in so many ways that aren’t even apparent. Together we were able to prevent dumping of wastewater directly into the river, and onto premium grapevines.

All of our North Sonoma County communities are doing more to try to develop recreational spaces that take advantage of the river’s proximity – including parks in Cloverdale, Healdsburg, and Windsor. We are also working to re-establish the tributaries that feed the river, including native plant replacement on Foss Creek. The council was very honored that the Russian Riverkeeper awarded Healdsburg the “Friend of the Russian River” award in 2009 acknowledging these efforts.

It’s not in our area, but my pug, Bubba, wanted me to mention a great event for celebrating Valentine’s day: the Paws for Love event on February 6 at the Finley Community Center. This is an evening of wine, chocolate, art and love to benefit homeless and abused animals. More info: www.pawsforlove.info

Every day just makes me happy to be part of such an amazing county!

Read article »

Cazadero News & Events February 2010

Wow, I am looking out of the windows of my cosy cyber-hut and the sun is shining! This is quite a contrast from the past 10 days of necessary and copious rainfall! I think that we will all agree that this respite is terrific! I don’t know if this is a signal that we are indeed, going to receive ‘normal’ rain this year.

I would like to remind you all to be very careful around the quickly moving creek.

I am happy that Raymond’s Bakery has reopened after a winter break. Lots of folks will happily resume their relaxing times there,while snacking on yummy baked goods!

Cazadero Supply continues to offer a great 15% Discount each 1st Saturday of the month. An incredible inventory awaits you! Another good way to save locally is to shop at the Cazadero General store-a friendly and warm spot.

After a brief hiatus, the Cazadero Community Club resumes monthly meetings on Tuesday, March 2nd-7 p.m. at the Firehall. The very low membership fee is due now. Only $10.00 for Individuals and $15.00 for families. Please send to CCC, P.O. Box 3,Cazadero, California 95421.All are welcome to come and help the Club plan a variety of enjoyable events which benefit the entire community,including the Cazadero VFD, FT.Ross VFD, Montgomery Elementary School, Community Garden, local college scholarships and more!

There has been a lot of activity at the Montgomery Elementary School. A new School Counselor, Marie Pampanin has just begun working at MES. Lifelong Cazadero resident Natalie Douglas is now teaching science in Grades K-8th.Several field trips are scheduled,including K-2nd grader’s visit to the Gymnastics center and Healthy Choice restaurant on Feb.10th.the 3rd-5th graders are creating gold rush games as history projects and planning a ‘Gold Rush day’. The 6-8th graders are studying the U.S. Constitution and planning to see the show’ Most Valuable Player’,which is the story of the great Jackie Robinson,as well as a jog-a-thon to raise funds for their spring trip to Westminster Woods.Valentine’s day card exchange and party on February 11th,followed by Presidents Washington’s and Lincoln’s birthdays. Also worth celebrating is Chinese New Year-GUNG HAY FAT CHOY! I have spent much time in Asian countries where this holiday is HUGE!! This is the Year of the Tiger.

Wishing Happy Birthdays to Ruary Lough,turning 20 on Feb.2nd,Matthew Harra will be 25 on the 4th,Andrew Harb turns 22 on the 18th,Natalie Canelis celebrates 24 years on Feb.19th,Jesus Velasquez-Greer will be 12 on the 22nd and Kiona Scherrer turns 21 on Feb.25th.

Community Radio Station KGGV FM lp, 95.1 (streaming on the ‘Net at www.kggvfm.org) is now in the 4th year of broadcasting. A terrific local resource for all.

Cuddle up with your sweetie on Valentine’s Day or pursue a romantic interest.

Please enjoy warm days by the stove and sunny days outside,call me at 632 5545 or email mayawrld@sonic.net with info for your Cazadero Column!

Read article »

Monte Rio: Valentine's Celebrations

Boy was that some incredible storms we had! I don’t think we will hear the “draught” word any more! This month brings us Groundhog Day on the 2nd, Valentine’s day on the 14th, Presidents Day is on Monday the 15th which celebrates Lincoln’s birthday which occurs on the 12th and Washington’s birthday which occurs on the 22nd, because that is way more convenient---didn’t you know. Ash Wednesday is on the 17th and then onto Lent!

The Village Inn has all kinds of things happening this month! First of all they will be celebrating Valentines Day for 3 days! Starting on Friday, Feb. 12 until Sunday, Feb. 14, when you make your reservations for dinner just mention that you are celebrating Valentines Day. Not only will you receive a complimentary glass of champagne but also your table will be decorated for Valentines Day! Also don’t forget that all lodging is 50% off for your guests, just mention that you are a local! They are also making Pizzas to go! It is a nice 15” pizza with 1 to 4 toppings---just call, order, and pick it up! They will also be doing smaller pizzas for the restaurant appetizer list! The Winemaker Dinners will begin again starting on Sunday Feb 28, with Wild Hog Vineyards. The next will be March 14 with Quivira, March 28 will feature J. Rickards Winery. These dinners get sold out very quickly so make your reservations by calling the Village Inn (865-2304). The cost of $48 includes your meal, wine, tax and tip---what a fun way to spend an evening!

The Rio Villa is also offering a February special that is really fun! If you are looking for someplace to relax for several days, this is the spot because the longer you stay the more money you save! They are celebrating February has $28 days! Just stay 2 or more nights, the first night is at full price and the remainder of your weekday nights (Monday–Thursday) are just $28 per night! Offer is good all of February; just mention “28 days”! Now that’s a great deal! Check out their website for more spectacular specials---riovilla.com.

Don’t forget to stop by Don’s Dogs Café for a fabulous breakfast burrito, buckwheat pancakes with sausage, pulled pork sandwich, or his amazing Cuban sandwich---and of course all the different and delicious Don’s Dogs! We have just printed up a great menu, so stop by and grab one---I guarantee you will be amazed!

Also, I am sure that you have noticed that Les Jummels has moved to Guerneville leaving the restaurant empty---but not for long! I spoke with the new ladies that will be re-opening the restaurant very soon. They have been in there cleaning, fixing and cleaning some more and plan to open hopefully sometime in February. They want to cook breakfast, lunch and dinner and do plan to have things like a pot roast special for just $9.95. They are working on a new name for the restaurant---one idea is the Drunken Robin---after the robins that come and eat the piracantha berries and get drunk. One of the new owners, Felice Angel, tells me that it was her mother’s dream to run this particular restaurant, so she has decided to do it in her honor. Felice says she is a published author and comes from Occidental. We wish them the best of everything in their new venture and welcome them to our little town.

Finally, just a mention---the Monte Rio Watch Group will be hosting a very important community meeting on March 29, call Dawn Bell at 865-9956 for information and times.

Read article »

Bohemian Grove Forest Management Protest

As many now know, the plan to log valuable stands of timber at the Bohemian Grove property in Monte Rio, California was signed off for approval by CALFIRE on December 29, 2009. This development, characterized by Judge Bill Newsom as a "thinly disquised plan..." to log "one of the last two great stands of old-growth" has disappointed more than a few, both Russian River residents and many of the environmentally conscious community.

So what's next? With such approvals, there's a thirty day window to file appeal via legal means. Who better to tell the story than John Hooper, organic farmer and past member of the Bohemian Club. John knows the Bohemian Club property and its trees far better than many, and as an owner of forestry stands himself, he has a strong sense of how forests can best be managed.

A wealth of information, including professional testimonials, forestry reports, and forestry management statistics relevant to the Bohemian Grove NTMP is available for review at

http://www.savebohemiangrove.org

John has taken time to discuss the situation's latest developments in an interview with David Kenly and Harvey Mendelson, and that interview is now online as a podcast.

To listen to the interview, podcast player software is required. We recommend iTunes for either MAC or PC. It's free and downloadable from the Apple site at http://www.apple.com/itunes/

Once iTunes (or a similar podcast player) is installed, subscribe to the ArrowFlight Green Parallel podcast to hear the interview with John Hooper. All you have to do is click on

itpc://www.arrowflight.com/podcasts/green.xml

or, in the event your computer doesn't accept this address, enter the following directly into the podcast subscription area of iTunes, usually found in the "Subscribe to Podcast" menu item in the "Advanced" menu.

http://www.arrowflight.com/podcasts/green.xml

Read article »

Sebastopol Raw Sewage Spill into Laguna de Santa Rosa

UPDATE January 21 - repair is complete - see below

This is an EMERGENCY message
from the City of Sebastopol.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - The City of Sebastopol has experienced a rupture of our main wastewater transmission pipe requiring us to shut down pumping to the treatment facility. City crews will be pumping and hauling wastewater generated in the City by truck to the treatment plant in Santa Rosa, until the wastewater main repairs are completed.

During the next 24-48 hours, residents are requested to limit indoor water use to a minimum, to minimize the amount of wastewater flow which must be trucked to the plant. In particular, use of dishwashers, clothes washers and showers should be curtailed during this period. If you have questions, call the Public Works Department at 823-5331 during normal business hours.
If you live in the City of Sebastopol, PLEASE immediately adopt strict conservation measures for all water use which might flow to the Laguna through the sewer system.

Thank you for your cooperation.

All residents that are downstream of the spill, from the city limits to the Russian River, 500 feet on both sides of the Laguna. (about 70 residents).

There has been an accidental release of wastewater into the Laguna De Santa Rosa surface waterway. If your water wellhead is under water, where contaminants can enter your well, do not use your water for the next 48 hours. Please avoid contact with the Laguna surface water as it may carry contaminants. If you have questions, call the Sebastopol Public Works Department at 823-5331, during normal business hours. Thank you for your cooperation.

UPDATE January 21 - repair is complete

January 21, 2010
At 11:37 a.m. on Wednesday, January 20, 2010, the City or Sebastopol received a report of a broken sewer main in the Meadowlark Field east of the Laguna de Santa Rosa, north of Highway 12. Public Works and Engineering staff responded to the scene and confirmed a break in the sewer transmission main which carries wastewater from the City of Sebastopol to the Subregional sewer treatment plant on Llano Road. At the time it was discovered, water was flowing from the broken main across the field to the drainage way leading to the Laguna de Santa Rosa.

The City immediately made the required reports to State regulatory authorities and proceeded to arrange for containment of the spill and repairs to the main. City residents were notified to conserve water as much as possible until repairs could be made, to limit the amount of wastewater flowing to the system.

At the time of the incident, the Laguna was flooding out of its banks into the field, due to heavy rains earlier in the morning. On the recommendation of the North Coast Regional Board, all residents downstream of Sebastopol with water wells within 500 feet of the Laguna de Santa Rosa were also notified of the wastewater spill.

The City had a contractor on scene by 12:50 p.m. to excavate the broken main and make repairs. Pump trucks were also deployed at the site of the main break to contain the leaking wastewater to the extent possible, and near the City’s sewer pumping station on Morris Street. The pump station was shut down and wastewater flowing in the system was pumped into tanker trucks and hauled to the treatment plant during the afternoon and evening, to divert wastewater flow from the area of the main break. The contractor completed repairs to the transmission main by 9:54 p.m. and the pumping system was put back in service.

The City continues to investigate the cause of this rupture, and will be assembling additional reports from our engineers and field personnel.

Susan Kelly, Public Information Officer
City of Sebastopol
(707) 823-2151
---------------------------------

The Laguna de Santa is an important tributary to the Russian River. What happens in the Laguna gets carried downstream to the Russian River then out to sea. Accidents happen and the City of Sebastopol is responding quickly to this problem. What's important is that people need to realize that this is not just a Sebastopol problem - it impacts the entire waterway from the spill put to the sea and beyond.

The GOOD NEWS is that it is being taken care of as diligently as possible by Public Works. Residents who rely upon the Sebastopol Wastewater System need to realize how much they play a part in the success of this defense and clean-up. Life does not go on as usual during the time it takes to haul wastewater away and fix the problem. Flushing the least amount of water down the drain makes the job easier - and quicker - for Public Works.

In these heavy rains the Laguna will flush itself out as well - and take a lot of cow manure from the dairies that line the Laguna along with the human waste. Agricultural lands that line our waterways also dump many products into the water as rains wash across surface soil and soak through layers of soil, leaching nutrients of all kinds in the process. All of this material ends up in the Laguina, the Russian River and the Pacific Ocean.

More than likely the 70 homes that line the Laguna down stream from the spill have septic systems along with their water wells and these systems get flush with rainwater at this time of year as well. Are all of these systems up to code and as efficient as a sewage treatment plant? Are all of the septic systems that are used in homes along the Russian River up to code nand keeping their effluent from entering our waterways?


The wastewater/sewage spill in Sebastopol has a short-term solution/fix that will bring their wastewater back into compliance within a few days. The Laguna, Russian River and Pacific Ocean are vulnerable 365 days a year.

Read article »

REVIEW: Monte Rio Wastewater Task Force meeting Jan 11

Review of Monte Rio Wastewater Task Group Meeting, January 11, 2010
Personal perspective by Lloyd Guccione, Guerneville

Follow-up letters below

The Monte Rio Wastewater Task Group (MRWWTG) met at the Monte Rio Community Center on Monday evening; January 11th. The Task Group is a group of citizens, property owners (both resident and outside of the area), contractors, and investment – speculator property owners. Its members include Ken Wikle, Dan Fein, Preston Smith, Leo Torr IV, Rene de Monchy, Gary Getchell, Chuck Berger, Doreen Atkinson, Jim Quigley, Steve Mack Richard “Rick” Holmer, Susie Baxman, and Fifth District Supervisor Efren Carrillo. This was the group’s fourth meeting and was important in that it brought together in a panel discussion the lead spokesmen for all the significant agencies that have relevance to the Task Group’s self-defined mission. Panelists included spokespersons from North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sonoma County Water Agency, Environmental Health and Safety, and Permit and Resources Management Department. Also in attendance was Kathleen Kane (Executive Director Community Development Commission) and twenty-five or so members of the public during the course of the meeting.

Background: The Task Group

The current Task Group was appointed by Kathleen Kane and followed upon two main events. The first was Mr. Mike Reilly’s ‘Amending Resolution’[1] which stripped the Oversight Committee of its ability to have subcommittees (among other impacts) and assigned to the CDC Executive Director the authority to both establish “Task Groups”, make the appointments to the groups, and oversee meetings. The second event was the collapse of the CSWS (Citizens for Sensible Wastewater Solutions), an ad-hoc group, when the Monte Rio Parks and Recreation District Board disbanded them as a subcommittee of that Board. The short-lived CSWS held only a few “formal” meetings and at least two of those had to on the picnic tables outside the Community Center because they could not pay for the facility, and because they were locked out (did not have keys).

The demise of the CSWS was due primarily to some glaring organizational and procedural problems, lack of a legitimate funding source to underwrite their efforts, and a legitimacy conferred by county government (e.g. CDC/Redevelopment). All of these shortcomings and difficulties have now apparently been overcome or addressed. The members of the ad-hoc CSWS (now almost all members of the MRWWTG) have learned from their past procedural and organizational errors and miss-steps. Dan Fein deserves much credit in helping the group in this respect as well as in guiding the group toward obtaining the legitimacy the Task Group now has. The funding (underwriting) was addressed by Mr. Reilly’s ‘Amending Resolution’ and the authority it ceded from the RRROC to the Executive Director of the CDC.[2] And the bureaucratic/institutional legitimacy was obtained through the appointment power of CDC and the sitting on the Task Force of Efren Carrillo; Fifth District Supervisor. Also deserving credit for this group’s rebirth and its massively reinvigorated possibilities are Ken Wikle (RRROC Chairman, Monte Rio Volunteer Firefighter), Victoria Wikle (Sweetwater Springs Water District Board Member). Steve Mack (Sweetwater General Manager) and Jim Quigley (Sweetwater Board Member and Windsor Water employee) have also added to the “weight” credibility of the group; Mr. Mack for his wastewater experience and the two of them together as important components in Sweetwater policy, operations, and/or governance. [Sweetwater Springs Water District is one of several “potential” lead agencies or administrative districts (entities) that may be essential to certain “solution” approaches being broached and discussed.]

Prior to the formation of the CSWS the key players in the CSWS (and now the MRWWTG) had largely been advocates/boosters of the Sheridan Ranch regionalized sewer approach and advocates/boosters of a rebuilding and development of the core (downtown) area of Monte Rio. The group also included individuals with interests and concerns surrounding building on undeveloped (vacant) parcels, renovation, remodeling, and expansion of current structures (residential and commercial). The members of the group, irregardless of their individual motivations and expectations, are all committed, intelligent, and community-minded (albeit each has his or her own important view of what ‘community-minded’ includes or excludes). In general they are all to be thanked for their work, their persistence, and their willingness to learn and accommodate.

On the current MRWWTG there are some notable questioning and constructive divergent perspectives; Doreen Atkinson and Gary Getchell.

The Meeting of Monday January 11, 2020

Dan Fein outlined the intent of the meeting, introduced the panelists, and explained the format for the meeting. Rene de Monchy provided some of the important background issues (AB 885, septic particulars, slopes, and explained a large map he and Preston Smith had created). Dan Fein, Rene de Monchy, and Preston Smith sat at the table in conjunction with the panelists and gave the appearance of being an executive group of the task force (at least for this meeting). The presentations by the three were well delivered, coherent, and avoided unnecessary repetitions. The attention of the public and the other Task Group members was retained and the question-comment/answer-commentary segment also went quite well. This is notable in that the concerns and discussion covered a rather large territory.

Some of the larger points/concerns addressed were; water body impairment and Section 303 (d) designation, AB 885 and its current legislative further working out including a conceptionalized ‘three-tier’ approach modification, Guerneville Treatment Plant status and capacity or lack of capacity issues, UC Davis and other monitoring undertakings, revised PRMD policies, and cost implications of certain approaches. All of these, however, were dealt with only in rather general and perhaps cursory detail. Some of this was due to time limitations, but also due to the outline provided to the panelists in anticipation of the meeting. Several of the panelists cited that they were not prepared to provide requested detail or greater specificity since the outline material they were provided did not provide the advance notice or expectation. This was particularly applicable to the NCWQCB’s spokesman.

The lack of more current detail and specificity can be understood by taking into account the “intent” of the meeting as a general informational outline. In other words the meeting was not structured to allow in-depth review of aspects, questions, or concerns. A further meeting is anticipated for Spring were there may be opportunity to reach for greater substance instead of a review. At least two members of the Monte Rio community; familiar with past efforts and meetings felt the meeting lacked sufficient ‘new’ data or perspectives to sustain their interest. They left the meeting early; slightly disappointed, if not disenchanted. Other members of the public seemed to appreciate the re-opening of the perennial issue and getting a review with some important (although general) updates.

The issue of water body impairment and the Section 303 (d) designation for the Russian River (e.g. Healdsburg at the bridge and that stretch between Fife and Dutch Bill creeks) was addressed. In connection with it Gary Getchell asked about the impact of the low flow regime and its attendant low flow-rates on data results for coliform bacteria and the other criteria of impairment including temperature and turbidity. Mr. Getchell made the point, through his question, that one action to address an issue (low flow to accommodate fishery issues) can and has had a subsequent deleterious effect upon the river. In example, lower river flows have resulted (allowed) in higher temperatures in the summer and the concentration of biologicals and other components that would have been sufficiently diluted (possibly) with what had been ‘normal’ flows before the regime was instituted. It is a clear example of how addressing one problem can lead to a set of new ones that are more intractable, expensive in solution, and politically and socially sensitive that expected. None of the panelists were able to give a sufficient answer either to Mr. Getchell’s question or to the equally important issue it implied.

When the question was raised about how a body or segment receives the 303 (d) designation: ‘How long does a single indicator (temperature, turbidity, coliform count) need to persist to trigger the designation?’ there was no clear responsive reply. There was also no enlightening response to questions regarding such impact specifics as motoring locations, flow-rates corollaries, eddies, water depth, daily or seasonal variations, and time specific events (such as children in a shallow ‘kiddie beach’). Another point that was not clearly or adequately addressed is how the 303 (d) designation can be rescinded. In other words (putting both aspects together) it was not made clear how long a monitoring result must be in effect before 303 (d) is triggered, or how long it must be absent for it to be rescinded. The best the panelists could offer is that it is easier to make the designation that it is to remove it. Perhaps they meant that it is hard to prove a negative and therefore rescinding a designation is exceedingly problematic. Even more simply; they didn’t know.

One of the troubling implications of the lack of a clear response is that a monitoring result, perhaps a single event, could trigger a designation that could take years to address and study and bushels of money and time. Not an encouraging or confidence building scenario. The current regimen has the propensity to initiate miss-leading positives and to act like a blinking light – now on, now off; the regulatory agencies will gladly acknowledge the “on” but have not quite figured out to how to address the “off”. After all, an “off” might well imply a diminishing of their (at any particular moment) purview; something bureaucracies eschew.

The concerns and review of AB 885, the legislature’s bill addressing septic systems state-wide, held little new concrete information. The review of the concerns, as raised by the overflow crowd at the Wells Fargo (Luther Burbank) meeting last February (2009), was good for that (a review) but did not carry things forward. The caveat to that is that the public was informed that it appears the legislature is moving toward a “three-tier” approach to implementation instead of the “one size fits all” approach. However, the changes will not offer any appreciable relief to Monte Rio over the initial AB 885 implications. This is due to Monte Rio’s location on the river, its slopes, and its predominate small (insufficient) lot sizes. While there was some soft comment that something may come out of the legislative/lobbying process this year it was implied that any active implementation of a worked out AB 885 was still many years off.

One limiting factor to the implementation of any worked out AB 885 is funding, and in connection with that the current state of the State’s finances is quite relevant. In addition to the costs to state and local government to implement any plan there is also the potentially prohibitive costs to property owners, the intrusiveness of the inspection requirements, and the inability of government (federal, state, or local) to underwrite or mitigate the costs. AB 885 looks like a well-intended idea; a good theory! But it also is seemingly absolutely impractical to implement. This impracticality; for cost and political reasons (the rural public does not appear to be ready, or willing, to accept it) does not seem to be going away soon.

Although analogies are always imperfect by their very nature they can be helpful. In a fashion AB 885 is like the regulations and changes that occurred in automobiles in pursuit of cleaning up the air. Everyone is for clean air; everyone is for clean water. The problems start when you try to figure out how to get from A to B. With cars we went the route of imposing exhaust emission limits on new cars and greater efficiencies. This lead to a host of innovations and results. The route, however, was not to require everyone to buy a new car and junk their old one. The theory in the car ‘model’ was that given time the newer models would replace the older ones by a kind of natural process.

With AB 885 the implication is otherwise. Still following the car analogy; an AB 885 type of law would have required everyone to have their car inspected yearly, pay $125-130 yearly (to start), and if it failed make the necessary repairs. Start thinking in multiples of 10’s of thousands of dollars. So far in essence not much different. But AB 885 would apply no matter how old your car was. It would be like taking your Model A, or your Bel-Air into inspection and told you didn’t pass and now you need to bring your classic up to current standards; even though yours is running just fine and dandy. Yes-siree-bob… you gotta’ add a catalytic converter, an O2 sensor, an air bag (make that two), a five mile per hour bumper, and you just read down the list yourself. The point is AB 885 is currently impractical and is being used as a “boogey-man” by way too many. And in addition to the annual inspections god help you if you wanted to restore or update your old jalopy or classic (house). If you want to replace more than one rusted fender and one bent bumper you’d get a real wake-up call in the pocket book and in the process (permit) line.

I know that the analogy is weak, but somehow it still gets me in the right kind of mood. Like… I like my old car; I take care of it:… I like my old house, I take care of it. I don’t ask anyone to take my crap away; I take care of it myself. Its my old heap… its my crap (so to speak) and I prefer to keep it that way. Now mind your own business and go and find some other ‘problem’ to fix somewhere else. Don’t need the likes of you round these here parts. We do care for our river, our neighbors, our septics, and our pocketbooks… thank you very much.

Conclusion:
The dialog and discussion on MRWTG and the attendant issues has taken off in the past few days and hopefully will reach a point of increased public exposure and responsiveness. It is clear that the Task Group members need to now individually put down in written form; actual pen to paper, what their individual perceptions of the issues and problems. These written presentations should (must) be in the context of the mission statement and the parameters of the Task Group. That means not all their individual problems or concerns, but those relevant to the (their) task at hand. Without these individual written perspectives no effective (firm) understanding will be forthcoming that is not subject to the critique (disparagement) of personal, personal business, bureaucratic, and growth self-service. Truly, the group needs to come to grips with what is self-evident to so many others; the group is refusing to distinguish itself from its previous incarnation; the CSWS, with its more obvious intentions and needs and its equally obvious shortcomings.

There is no need for the individual members of the group to eschew such a task; writing down their views of the issues and problems. Once done let these be made available and (I believe; if done with candor) the result will provide a must needed understanding of the various terrains each brings to the table. Once done this will allow (accommodate) discussion on a level playing field (show your cards!) instead of this money consuming effort being turned into a political game-play.

-----------------------
[1] The formal (legal) title of the resolution is: Revised Procedures for the Composition, Election and Continuing Role of the Citizens’ Oversight Committee for the Russian River Redevelopment Project.

[2] Note: It must be stated that the rationale given for the elimination of the RRROC’s subcommittees was that CDC could not support their activities due to staffing and budgetary restraints. Following the passing of the ‘Amending Resolution’ these constraints somehow evaporated and staffing, staff time, and discretionary budgetary funds became available. [The RRROC previously had declined to form a specific subcommittee to address the Monte Rio Wastewater (Sewer) matter finding that no project existed or was being put forward. Also its Infrastructure Subcommittee declined to focus on the issue and was additionally specifically barred from developing liaisons with relevant governmental (county and state) departments, agencies, and/or individuals.

ADDENDUM:

Mr. Richard Holmer has written to Mr. Todd Thompson of the State Water Resources Control Board a well conceived letter on AB 885. Assembly Bill 885 which concerns septic systems is relevant to those of us hooked up to the Grenville Treatment Plant in that the Plant is being
considered (viewed) as an option (again) by the proponents of a Monte Rio Wastewater Solutions program. Such a prospect could have significant impacts on sewer cost (future assessment increases) as well as other considerations.

I encourage you to share this with your other neighbors.

Please keep yourself informed on the activities and participants in the Monte Rio Wastewater Solutions Task Force of the Community Development Commission/Russian River Redevelopment Project. Get informed about local issues. Participate and have confidence in your own abilities to have an important and relevant impact. Voting is not enough; participation is local issues and goverance is vital.

Text of Mr. Holmer's letter is below:

January 15, 2010

Mr. Todd Thompson, P.E.
Division of Water Quality
State Water Resources Control Board
1001 I Street
P.O. Box 2231
Sacramento, CA 95812

Dear Todd:

Subject: Comments on “Proposed Regulations and Waiver for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (Septic Systems) and the Associated Draft Impact Report (EIR)” currently being developed pursuant to AB885

As you know, I was involved with the Sonoma County septic system program for 32 years (until my retirement from public service) and I was in charge of the program from 1995 to 2004. I attended the initial hearings on AB885 as a representative of the County of Sonoma. At that
time, I raised the issue of existing dwellings that would not be able to comply with the proposed regulations due to substandard lot size or other issues. I was assured that this would be dealt with during the process of developing the regulations. My review of the current draft
finds that the language about existing dwellings on septic systems is ambiguous and appears potentially confiscatory. I have detailed my comments on this subject below as well as my comments on other aspects of the regulations.

At this time, I feel that the regulations have significant fatal flaws and should not be adopted due to the unintended consequences which may result. I also feel that the EIR is not adequate particularly in the economic analysis.

My comments follow:

EXISTING DWELLINGS ON SEPTIC SYSTEMS

History: Many areas in California that are served by septic systems were developed primarily for recreational purposes; often when local land use regulations were limited or nonexistent. I will use Sonoma County as an example but this applies to other counties as well.

In Sonoma County there are thousands of lots that were subdivided prior to any septic system regulations or land use planning. Some of these subdivisions date back to the early 1900's. Many of these lots are extremely substandard in size for a septic system based on current
standards. At the time that they were subdivided, the lots were intended for seasonal use and often had only a cesspool or pit privy for sewage disposal. Over the course of time, the residences have become converted to full time occupancy and are often the best source of
affordable housing for low income families.

When conventional septic system standards are applied to these situations, it is simply impossible to meet standards for sizing of absorption fields, setbacks to water ways, depth of soil requirements and many other issues. In response, Sonoma County has developed an
extensive program of alternative wastewater systems that includes the provision for waiver to septic system standards where in can be demonstrated that the system being proposed as a replacement system provides a clear and positive improvement over the existing system and
represents the best available technology for the specific site constraints.

Without this type of approach, the septic systems could not be repaired or replaced and the house would not be able to be occupied. It should be noted that all on-site sewage disposal systems have a finite lifetime and will become subject to repair or replacement at some point. In
order to prevent the widespread condemnation of older housing, the proposed septic system regulations must provide for flexibility in application of the standards to existing houses.

Proposed regulations: The sections of the proposed regulations that mention repair or replacement of septic systems are ambiguous and subject to interpretation. There is no provision for waivers or exemptions to the regulations.

In Section 30000 (definitions), “New OWTS” is defined as “an OWTS permitted after the effective date of this chapter”. Does this mean that the issuance of a permit to repair a system, issued after the effective date of the regulations, triggers meeting the requirements for a new system?

“Existing OWTS” is defined as “an OWTS that was either permitted by the applicable local agency or legally installed before the effective date of this chapter”. This appears to imply that the replacement of a system has to meet all of the requirements.

Section 30001 (b) states that this chapter applies to all new OWTS and only to existing OWTS where specifically indicated. This section speaks only to the OWTS and not to the dwelling. There is no recognition of the need to differentiate between existing houses served by septic systems versus new construction of houses.

In section 30002, there appears to be an attempt to differentiate between new and replaced OWTS. Section 30002 (b) refers to “new and replaced OWTS” having to be designed to maximize treatment of wastewater. Section 30002 (c) states that “new OWTS” “shall be
designed, operated and maintained in accordance with the requirements of this chapter”. Does this mean that replacement OWTS do not have to meet the design requirements? If this is the intent, then it should be clearly stated as such and the standards for a replacement OWTS should
be clarified. This is especially confusing given the requirements under the definitions section described above.

EIR: If the regulations are not flexible in their application to existing dwellings, then there are huge economic impacts that have not been addressed in the economic analysis. This analysis should quantify the number of existing dwellings that would be unable to meet the new standards and would be subject to condemnation. This is a critical aspect of the new regulations that has been completely overlooked. This impact, in my opinion, is potentially the most significant impact of the proposed regulations unless there are changes made to allow existing
houses on septic systems to repair or replace their systems even if they cannot meet the proscriptive standards contained in the regulations.

WELL WATER SAMPLING

Section 30002 (t) requires routine testing of the drinking water well on the property where the OWTS is situated. The specified testing includes a variety of mineral tests for constituents that are not of public health significance. Specifically the required testing includes calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, iron, manganese, zinc, sulfate, chloride, total alkalinity, carbonate, bicarbonate, MBAS and pH. Although these tests may be of interest to a property owner in determining whether or not they need a water softener or other mineral removal devices, they are not indicative of any kind of threat to the property owner’s health. It is excessive to require these kinds of tests and is an unnecessary expense. Routine testing for coliform organisms and nitrate could be justified.

GROUNDWATER LEVEL MONITORING

Section 30012 sets requirements for monitoring groundwater levels prior to installation of a new OWTS. These requirements stipulate continuous monitoring of groundwater for a period of five months during the winter months. This will be very expensive and is much more restrictive than
what is typically currently required in California. It could also lead to inaccuracies from heavy storms or due to damage to the testing equipment when it is subjected to conditions in the field for five months. Most jurisdictions now require one test during the wettest part of the year. For the purposes of installing a household septic system, this has proven to be adequate. There is inadequate substantiation of problems with the existing testing methods to justify this onerous
requirement.

LEACHFIELD DESIGN

Section 30014 (b) requires that “dispersal systems” (leachfields) be designed using only the square footage of bottom area of the trench for infiltration. This is an extremely poor design requirement. It has been repeatedly shown that the bottom area of a leachfield will clog
very quickly during operation due to formation of biofilm and physical clogging with suspended particles in the wastewater. Most jurisdictions in California have required that systems be designed based upon sidewall area of the leach trench because this is the effective absorption area during most of the life of the leachfield. The use of bottom area for sizing will result in wider trenches with less sidewall per linear foot of trench. This will hasten premature failure of the leachfield system when the bottom of the trench becomes clogged. There is no scientific
evidence to support use of bottom area for leachfield sizing.

IMPAIRED WATER BODIES

Section 30040 stipulates that no new system shall be constructed within 600 feet of the “edge of the river bank” of an impaired river. This is extremely vague. Many rivers do not have clearly defined banks. They are often characterized by a series of flood plateaus that can extend great distances from the typical course of water flow. This section would be subject to interpretation that would result in discrepancies between jurisdictions. There are ways to define this
more accurately such as: edge of summer water flow, edge of 10 year flood plane, or edge of floodway.

It is also unclear whether the impaired water body is meant to be simply the area described in the 303(d) listing or also including the tributaries to the listed water body. The maps shown as an attachment to the regulations show all of the tributary streams to the listed water
bodies. For example, a stretch of the lower Russian River from Fife Creek to Dutch Bill Creek is listed as an impaired water body, a relatively small portion of the lower river. Map 20 of the attachment, however, shows every tributary to that stretch of the river as an impaired water body. This is a huge expansion of the 303 (d) listing. If the intent is to include these tributaries, then the regulations become extremely burdensome to property owners.

EIR: The EIR significantly understates the costs to homeowners adjacent to 303 (d) listed water bodies particularly in relation to the attached maps which expand the boundaries of the impaired water bodies. There is no attempt to provide a statewide tally of costs to property owners. There are only estimated costs for a few areas in the state. This does not provide adequate information for the decision makers to make an informed decision on the true economic impacts of adopting these regulations.

SETBACKS

Oddly enough, the regulations do not include any requirements for the distance that an OWTS must be located from water wells, rivers, streams, lakes, etc. This is a fundamental provision of any regulation relating to OWTS. The executive summary makes a vague reference to these
setbacks being contained within “existing regulations”. Which existing regulations? The California Plumbing Code, Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plans, and individual County Codes all set standards for setback requirements. Often these are contradictory. Having individual jurisdictions adopt their own setback requirements would be in conflict with the goal of having uniform statewide OWTS standards. The proposed regulations should either contain setback standards or should adopt them by reference to another code.

Richard L. Holmer
Registered Environmental Health Specialist #3145

--------------------------------

Dear Mr. Guccione,

The draft regulations circulated on Nov. 7, 2008 were retracted on Nov.
6, 2009.

The State Water Resources Control Board staff is fully reconsidering ways to fulfill the requirements set forth in Water Code Section 12291 (as added by AB 885 in 2000). We do not currently have a schedule for this process.

Thank You,

Todd Thompson, P.E.
Program Manager
DoD/Site Cleanup Program
Division of Water Quality
State Water Resources Control Board
1001 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
tthompson@waterboards.ca.gov
916 341 5518

Read article »

El Molino Honor Roll for the Fall Semester, 2009-2010

Doria Trombetta, Principal of El Molino High School, is happy to announce the El Molino Honor Roll for the Fall Semester, 2009-2010. There are an additional 29 students who have earned a place on the El Molino Honor Roll whose name is not included pursuant to Education Code 49073 Release of Pupil Directory Information allowing directory information to remain private. Each of the students earning recognition on the Honor Roll has achieved scholastic distinction and should be commended for the effort and diligence that led to academic success.

EL MOLINO HIGH SCHOOL

FALL 2009-2010

WITH HONORS

(3.00-3.39)

Adams, Jesse
Alberini, Jaye-P
Amador-Musco, Haleigh
Amormino, Alexis
Amormino, Max
Aparacio, Martha
Aparicio, Guadalupe
Bell, Ashley
Bernier, Kiera
Bowen, Rianna
Bradford, Michael
Brooke, Lacey
Brookfield, Clay
Bruhner, Anna
Burtner, Katrina
Carmona, Laura
Carpenter, Brittany
Carpenter, Jasmin
Castellino, Bella
Celli, Nicholas
Clarke, Molly
Coleman, Kevin
Coria, Monserrat
Coxon, Robert
Coyston, Charles
Curtiss, Akiema
Curtiss, J'Mari
Daleiden, Kaya
Dasalla, Elvis
Daveiro, Danielle
Davis, Lauren
Dec-Hull, Mila
Doughty, Daniel
Downey, Lina
Eldridge, Hanna
Elliott, Hank
Flowers, Benjamin
Formaker, Ned
Fox, Elizabeth
Franceschi, Richard
Franceschi, Ryan
Frazee, Daniel
Fresquez, Erin
Fry, Julia
Garcia, Gerardo
Garner, Jared
Gemini, T.R.
Gentry, Kaitlyn
Giordano, Jose
Gong, Matthew
Gregonis, Hayden
Gutierrez, Cesar
Guzman, Azeneth
Hale, Regina
Hansen, Northern
Hanson, Mark
Harned, Caitlin
Haug, Justin
Hemphill, Dalton
Hemphill, Travis
Hennen, Christopher
Hernandez, Marina
Herr, Alyssa
Higgins, Kira
Hoener, Joshua
Hoener, Sara
Horn, Kali
Hughes, Justin
Johnson, Alisha
Johnson, Althea
Kent, Grace
Kirley, Tanner
Kracker, Janet
Kringen, Aiden
Kumano, Ryoko
LeBrun, Tyler
Lemus, Yesenia
Lerner-Ross, Dakota
Levine, Shayna
Lokka, Tye
Lopez Ortiz, Maira
Lopez, David
Lopez, Hector
Lynn, Nichole
Mack, Elizabeth
Manni, Melissa
Martin, Benjamin
Martin, Matthew
Martin, Olivia
Martinez, Daniel
Mattei, Brandon
McAlvain, Brianna
McLarty, Marissa
McLees, Melissa
McMahan, Scott
Monticello, Tory
Moore, Jacqueline
Mori, Matthew
Mountjoy, Emmett
Muckle, Lacey
Munsterman, Korissa
Newman, Martin
Nielsen, Miranda
Nordby, Jordan
Novozhilov, Mikhail
O'Donnell, John
Onofre, Saul
Ornell, James
Ornell, Julia
Owen, Steven
Park, Spencer
Parsons, Brooke
Paul, Azuriah
Pedro, Danyel
Pentecost, Brett
Petersen, Jacob
Peterson, Reina
Petracek, Miriam
Ponce, Laurel
Prieto, Clayton
Pritchard, Kelsey
Prouty, Scott
Raff, Chelsea
Ramirez, Noelia
Rampone, Kerri
Reece, Cole
Reinke, Tyler
Robbins, James
Roberts, Kayla
Sanchez, Erick
Sanchez, Taylor
Sandeen, Calvin
Saulsbury, James
Scott, Colton
Shkurkin, Alexander
Solorio Flores, Ana Karen
Spriggs, Robin
Stuart, Carly
Thiessen, Troy
Tolfa, Kirk
Turner, Maenza
Valley, Jamie
Veille, Sierra
Vierra, Aren
Vierra, Emma
Vigil, Jose
Whisman, John
Wonderwheel, Savanna
Wylie, Ashleigh
Zemrak, Zachariah

EL MOLINO HIGH SCHOOL

FALL 2009-2010

HIGH HONORS

(3.40-3.69)

Adair, Clayton
Afman, Karla
Alberigi-Speicher, Analisa
Andersen, Kayla
Auch, Tasha
Bartoo, Alyssa
Bauer, Julian
Berry, Emily
Bonacorso, Marina
Borges, Von
Brown, Julie
Butler, Francesca
Capurro, Warren
Catelani, Sierra
Clarke, Spencer
Coxon, Daniel
Cresswell, Aunalisa
DeCarly, Shelby
Deutscher, Evelyn
Diehl, Chelsea
Edwards, Laurin
Ernst, Nico
Fay, Nicole
Foster, Shelby
Freeman, Matthew
Garcia, Amelia
Gieseke, Cheyenne
Gross, Rachael
Gutierrez, Griselda
Halpern, Kaya
Hart, Kelly
Hernandez, Rebecca
Hersam, Donald
Heyerly, Logan
Higgins, Ashleigh
Holguin, Billy
Holup, Maddy
Hughes, Nicholas
Kohler, Koleyna
Kracker, Rebecca
Larson, Brianna
Lemus, Elizabeth
Leveque-Eichhorn, Augustus
Lezama, Alejandra
Lindquist, Kurt
Lipske, Vallena
Long, Aaron
Lunardi, Taylor
Markham, Timmy
McMinimy, Molly
Miguel, Emily
Mincberg, Alana
North, Savannah
O'Donnell, Ann
Olmsted, Taylor
Olson, Whitney
Pellinacci, Anthony
Plaugher, William
Romeo, Teresa
Romero, Ximena
Salas, Andrea
Sanchez, Claudia
Schulz, Benjamin
Spediacci, Julia
Stice, Carly
Stonebreaker, Elijah
Strand, Emilie
Toruno, Alessio
Towon, Brienna
Vargas, Rodrigo
Warner, Savannah
Warren, Megan
Weatherly, Shelbie
Whitman, John
Yoast, Ryan
Youngberg, Braedyn

EL MOLINO HIGH SCHOOL

FALL 2009-2010

HIGHEST HONORS

(3.70-4.00+)

Alvarez, Delena
Auch, Justin
Aughenbaugh, Julia
Bardella, Andrea
Bauer, Hanna
Bedient, Alan
Berry, Kaity
Booth, Robert
Bosch, Naomi
Brock, Nelson
Carlson, John
Caswell, Alena
Caswell, Isaac
Connally-Stewart, Will
Cornelis, Andrew
Damos-Deurloo, Kenneth
Deis, Faith
DiMeola, Annetta
Douglass, Joseph
Durkin, Will
Endries, Molly
Ernst, Emma
Eschenbach, Talia
Fichman, Jesse
Franceschi, Lara
Green, Taoh
Gutierrez, Forrest
Gutierrez, Jessica
Gutierrez, Monico
Halisi, Marena
Halverson, Angela
Hedlund, Benjamin
Hedlund, Brigid
Hennen, Connor
Hough, Benjamin
Janney, Lauren
Killian, Anthony
Koenig, Sierra
Kringen, Kiernan
La Rue, Autumn
Lane, Nicole
Leahy, Leah
Lee, Gloria
Licciardo, Dylan
Lipske, Forrest
Madden, Karolina
Miguel, Megan
Mitteldorf, Shona
Mori, Beau
Neal, Ashlin
Newman, Madeline
Nonella, Megan
Ornell, Elizabeth
Otsen, Miranda
Paneno, Rose
Parsons, Mitchell
Pipho, Krista
Reiter, Jessica
Rodenbaugh, Kalii
Rodriguez-Pedroza, Alberto
Romeo, Kirstyn
Saunders, Alexander
Scales, Rachel
Shkurkin, Nikolai
Singler, Stephanie
Sisomphou, Claudia
Snyder, Nicholas
Srna, Emily
Stuart, Thomas
Sword, Chris
Vigil, Monica
Wandel, Carina
Watson, Kaitlynne
Whitman, Hannah
Zapata, Yasminne
Zeigler, Sabrina

Read article »